The Real Reason Sunscreens Haven’t Changed Since the 90s

If you’ve picked up a bottle of sunscreen recently, you might be surprised to learn that — chemically speaking — it’s almost identical to what your parents used in the 1990s.

That’s not an exaggeration. The U.S. hasn’t approved a single new UV filter in over 25 years.
While Europe and Asia have moved on to smoother, lighter, more advanced formulas, American sunscreens are still built on the same chemistry that powered the SPF boom of the late 20th century.

So why are we stuck — and are our sunscreens actually outdated? Let’s unpack the science, the history, and what you can do to get the safest and most effective protection today.


☀️ How Sunscreen Actually Works

Despite all the marketing, every sunscreen you see on the shelf falls into one of two scientific categories: mineral or chemical.

Mineral Sunscreens

These use zinc oxide or titanium dioxide, natural minerals that sit on top of your skin and reflect UV rays like microscopic mirrors.
They’re physical blockers — what you put on the surface stays there, forming a gentle barrier between your skin and the sun.

Chemical Sunscreens

These use organic compounds such as avobenzone or octocrylene that absorb UV rays and convert them into heat.
They tend to feel lighter and go on clear, but their filters can degrade faster in sunlight, which is why chemical formulas often include stabilizers or additional filters for balance.

Both types work — they just take different scientific routes to protect your skin.


💧 Why They Feel So Different

If you’ve ever noticed that some sunscreens feel chalky while others feel silky, it’s because of how they’re built.

  • Mineral sunscreens: Thicker texture, can leave a white cast, but ideal for sensitive skin.

  • Chemical sunscreens: Weightless, transparent, and smooth under makeup — but may sting or irritate reactive skin types.

The best choice depends on what you’ll actually wear every day — because sunscreen only works when it’s used consistently.


📜 A Quick History Lesson: Why the U.S. Fell Behind

The last time the FDA approved a new UV filter was 1999 — back when we were burning CDs and texting on flip phones.

Meanwhile, countries like Japan, South Korea, and across the EU were approving newer, more photostable UV filters that last longer in sunlight and feel lighter on skin.

So are U.S. sunscreens “bad”?
Not at all. They’re just running on older chemistry — safe, tested, and reliable, but not as elegant or efficient as newer options abroad.


🧾 Why the U.S. Is Stuck (But Still Safe)

Here’s the key reason:
In the U.S., sunscreens are regulated as drugs, not cosmetics.

That means every new UV filter must go through the same approval process as prescription medication — years of testing, clinical trials, and regulatory hurdles.

In the EU and Asia, sunscreens are classified as cosmetics, so innovation moves faster.
The result? Americans are still limited to the same filters from the 90s, while global brands have advanced to smoother, more protective options.

The good news: our current filters are safe and effective, just not the newest.


🔬 The New Generation of UV Filters (That We Don’t Have Yet)

Across Europe and Asia, you’ll find sunscreen ingredients like:

  • Tinosorb S and Tinosorb M

  • Uvinul A Plus and Uvinul T 150

These are modern chemical filters designed to be more photostable (they don’t break down quickly in sunlight) and provide stronger UVA coverage — the rays responsible for premature aging.

Regulators overseas have tested them extensively and found low skin absorption and excellent UV-blocking efficiency.

In the U.S., however, these filters haven’t yet passed FDA approval. That means American consumers are limited to older filters like avobenzone, oxybenzone, and octinoxate — or safer, universal options like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide.

If you want guaranteed safety, mineral sunscreens remain the gold standard — especially for daily, long-term use.


🌊 The Ingredient Debate: Reef-Safe and Non-Toxic Matters

You’ve probably seen “reef-safe” and “paraben-free” labels all over sunscreen shelves.
That’s because several chemical filters — notably oxybenzone and octinoxate — have been linked to coral bleaching and potential hormone disruption.

In 2018, Hawaii officially banned those ingredients, prompting brands worldwide to reformulate.

Most modern sunscreens now exclude them altogether, while mineral sunscreens are naturally reef-safe and hypoallergenic.


✅ How to Pick the Right Sunscreen

If you take one thing from this, make it this checklist.

Your Sunscreen Should Be:

  • SPF 30 or higher
  • Broad-spectrum (covers both UVA + UVB)
  • Oxybenzone-free and paraben-free
  • Zinc oxide or titanium dioxide–based for mineral options
  • Lightweight and wearable — because consistency is what counts

Remember: the best sunscreen is the one you’ll actually wear every single day.


🧠 Final Thoughts: Old Chemistry, Proven Protection

Yes, U.S. sunscreens are still built on formulas from the 1990s — but the science around them has evolved.
Our current UV filters may be “old,” but they’re well-studied, stable, and safe when used correctly.

If you’re after the light, invisible elegance of modern global sunscreens, try mineral blends that use micronized zinc — they’re cleaner, simpler, and universally protective.

And if you want to go a step further, support your skin from within.


🌿 Glow from the Inside with Carotenoids

While sunscreen protects your skin from the outside, antioxidants like beta-carotene, astaxanthin, and vitamin C help defend it from the inside.

That’s why we created Bronze Bites Tanning Gummies — a daily carotenoid supplement designed to boost your natural glow, enhance UV resilience, and protect your skin from photoaging.

Together, sunscreen + Bronze Bites form a complete, inside-out approach to healthy, radiant skin.


Bottom Line:
The sunscreen industry might still look like it’s living in the 90s, but your approach doesn’t have to.
Stay protected on the outside, stay nourished on the inside, and let your glow be built on both science and balance.

Back to blog